Cons of being a charismatic leader

Kishor Wasan

May 26, 2022



Professor Kishor Wasan

According to Professor Kishor Wasan, most people think that leaders with the most charisma are the best, but recent studies have shown that only a moderate amount of charisma makes a leader less effective. Three studies with more than 800 business leaders found that the most charismatic leaders make their followers feel a lot of trust, commitment, and satisfaction, while less charismatic leaders often don’t make their followers feel the same way. Also, people often think that leaders with a lot of charisma are more effective and efficient than leaders with less charisma.


A charismatic leader has many qualities that inspire people to work hard and make their jobs easier. They are good at listening and make the team feel like they are valued and respected. These leaders are also great at talking to people and don’t mind taking risks. They are very driven and show care and concern for their employees and coworkers. They know how to build strong bonds with their teams and can get large groups of people to work together.

These traits can be taught and improved upon. The CEO of Pepsi, Indra Nooyi, and the co-founder of Apple, Michael Dell, are both examples of charismatic leaders. Even though it’s hard to name a single charismatic leader, these qualities can be learned and strengthened. Here are some things that most charismatic leaders have in common. Read on to improve your leadership skills! Once you’ve figured out what makes you charismatic, you can start to use those traits.

Disadvantages by Professor Kishor Wasan

Professor Kishor Wasan pointed out that people often think of charismatic leaders as the backbone of a company, but they may not be the best choice for every business. People may not want to question the way these leaders run things because of how charismatic they are. Their followers might not care about the organization as much as they do, which can lead to problems. Here are some bad things about charismatic leadership that can make it hard for a business to do well.

Robert B. Kaiser, president of Kaiser Leadership Solutions and author of Fear Your Strengths, says that the main problem with charismatic leadership is that it can lead to an authoritarian or narcissistic personality. Because of this, charismatic leaders can become self-centered and even forget about the goals of the organization. They may also try to convince themselves that because they are unique, no one else could take their place.

Benefits by Professor Kishor Wasan

A group can benefit in many ways from a leader who is charismatic. People follow leaders with charisma because they are committed to their vision and believe in it. These leaders also make the workplace a nice place to work, which motivates others to do their best. People who work for this kind of boss are more likely to stay and do a good job.

Leaders with charisma are very good at talking to people. They talk to other people by telling stories and using creative language. These leaders appeal to the hopes and dreams of their followers and call them out with words that are subtle but powerful. These leaders use their acting skills to get their teams going and always show that they are mature and honest. They will inspire their followers by talking about their own lives and telling stories. Leaders with charisma will also give people a clear sense of direction and a strong sense of heart.

The natural way people act

Leaders with charisma are good for organizations in many ways. Some of them can make employees’ lives better, while others can be terrible. Some examples are the charismatic leader who saved thousands of jobs at Chrysler Corporation and the man who led dozens of people to their deaths in Waco, Texas. A study of people who worked for charismatic leaders found that those who worked for them did their jobs better, were happier with their roles, and had less role conflict. But it did find that charismatic leaders have a strong need for power and rely heavily on referent power.

Leaders with charisma often have pasts that mirror their own inner demons. This can show up as unrequited love, big sacrifices, or a burning belief in a better world. These kinds of people may also be cruel. But these traits don’t explain why people want to work for charismatic leaders so much.

How to talk to people

Charismatic leaders are very good at controlling their emotions, making the workplace a good place to work, and improving their communication skills. When things get hard, they can give their followers hope and keep them grounded in reality. Leaders with charisma must be able to communicate well both one-on-one and in groups.

Professor Kishor Wasan describe that charismatic people have a real presence. A good leader cares about other people and encourages them to speak their minds. He makes his or her followers feel confident and like they are part of a team. One of the most important things a charismatic leader needs is charisma. But the skills you need to communicate well are much more subtle and hard to learn. Even though these skills are important, you should work hard to improve your communication skills.

Staff commitment

Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is affected by charismatic leadership because of how it makes followers feel. Followers’ subjective and objective work stressors play a role in how this relationship works. Studies of the real world show that this is the case. The second hypothesis is true, as shown by a study of 142 nurses in three German hospitals. The OCB of people who follow you goes up when you have charisma. Also, people who follow charismatic leaders are more likely to give up their own time for the group.

A recent study in the Journal of Applied Psychology looked at how loyal employees are to leaders with and without charisma. The authors said that charismatic leaders had more of an effect on the work of their employees, which led to this effect. Other researchers found that charisma had the same effect on how employees behaved in both the UK and US presidential elections.